Enbridge says Line 3 replacement could exceed $9 billion
Enbridge Inc says there is a risk its Line 3 replacement project could exceed its previous cost estimate of $9 billion because of delays to permits in the United States.
Once complete, Line 3 will carry 760,000 barrels per day of western Canadian crude to U.S. markets, according to Reuters. In March Enbridge said the in-service date would be delayed by almost a year until the second half of 2020 because of slower-than-expected permitting in the U.S. state of Minnesota.
Enbridge told analysts on a quarterly earnings call as long as permits are in hand by year-end the project will start running in the latter part of next year.
“The late schedule likely means higher costs on the U.S. side although we are running under budget in Canada,” Enbridge chief executive Al Monaco told Reuters, adding that returns remained “very robust” and the company did not expect any cost overruns to be material to its financial outlook.
Enbridge is also in talks with shippers about introducing long-term, set volume contracts on its 2.85 million bpd Mainline system, moving away from the current monthly allocation system.
The company addressed concerns from smaller oil producers that they may struggle to meet the minimum terms being proposed.
“We are going to great lengths in terms of the way our offering is being developed to accommodate many of the issues and concerns and opportunities that our shippers are putting in front of us,” Guy Jarvis, Enbridge president of liquids pipelines told Reuters, adding that small producers can contract for as little as 6,000 bpd.
Enbridge plans to launch an open season in mid-July.
The Calgary-based company beat analysts’ estimates for quarterly profit as it benefited from transporting more oil and gas across its pipelines.
Enbridge shipped 2.7 million bpd on the Mainline system during the first quarter, up from 2.6 million bpd in the year-ago quarter.
Adjusted earnings rose to $1.64 billion in the first quarter, from $1.38 billion in same quarter of 2018.
On an adjusted per share basis, the company earned 81 cents, while analysts’ on average had expected 72 cents, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.