U.S. proposal to ease methane emission regulations bad news for Canadian producers: CAPP
A U.S. proposal to ease regulations aimed at cutting methane emissions will create another competitive advantage for American producers over Canadians, the CEO of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) says.
On Thursday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency told Canadian Press it is following President Donald Trump’s directive to remove regulatory burdens on the oil and gas sector by considering rescinding many of its requirements to monitor and plug methane leaks at oil and gas facilities and wells.
The move would reverse regulations put in place after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and then-U.S. president Barack Obama jointly agreed in 2016 to chop methane emissions by more than 40 per cent from 2012 levels by 2025 by cracking down on the oil and gas sector.
“Prime Minister Trudeau and president Obama on many fronts in the last days of the Obama presidency made common commitments and we see over and over again the U.S. stepping away from those commitments and Canada forging ahead,” CAPP CEO Tim McMillan told Canadian Press. “If Canada’s going to go it alone on carbon pricing, on Arctic drilling moratoriums, on methane regulations, we have to do it efficiently.”
The industry can meet its 45 per cent methane emissions reduction target but Ottawa’s proposed regulations which are expected to kick in next year are an inefficient solution and duplicate provincial government programs, McMillan said.
But Dale Marshall, national climate change manager for Environmental Defence, told Canadian Press that Canada should stay on its path to federally regulate methane emissions even if it means going alone.
“Methane reductions are some of the cheapest ways to address climate change,” he said. “We know we can get to our target for somewhere under $10 a tonne and that is incredibly cheap to address a whole bunch of emissions.”
He said provincial methane regulations, especially in Alberta and Saskatchewan, are much weaker than the proposed federal rules.
He added it’s better to have one set of regulations to cover all of Canada than to regulate one province at a time.